|
Written by Bill
|
|
Wednesday, 21 July 2010 02:46 |
|
This is making the rounds on the net, and it reminded me how fascinated I am by the graffiti on bathroom stalls. The mix of intelligent humor and toilets really cracks me up.
Source
|
|
Last Updated on Wednesday, 21 July 2010 03:00 |
|
|
Hey Mark, Stop Acting Like An Asshole |
|
|
|
|
Written by Bill
|
|
Tuesday, 25 May 2010 22:17 |
|
There are a lot of aspects of the recent Facebook privacy debacle that evoke hostility towards the website. A shift in privacy context and the assumed consent of users likely the top list for most. However, I believe that Mark Zuckerberg and company are doing a lot to take would could have been a heated public debate about the nature of privacy online and turning it into a national flamewar. What are they doing exactly? They are acting like condescending assholes.
|
|
Last Updated on Wednesday, 26 May 2010 16:20 |
|
Read more...
|
|
Why a Move to Cloud Computing Matters |
|
|
|
|
Written by Bill
|
|
Thursday, 01 April 2010 18:35 |
|
For most of the 90s and the early 2000s the home PC served as the foundation for an incredibly generative computing platform. By generative I mean that this PC platform allowed for relatively easy innovation and modification. Pretty much anybody was able to install whatever software was available to them, either at a store or on the Internet, in order to modify their PC foundation to meet their needs and desires. At the same time, because the PC platform was so open, a great number of people were able to create programs to meet their needs and desires, and with the advent of the Internet these programs could easily be distributed to users all over the world who wished to install them. During this period a set of social, economic, and technical norms were established regarding a user’s ability to modify and define their personal computing platform. In general, users either purchased a finished piece of software or they acquired free (as in beer) software in order to modify the functionality of the PC hardware that they owned. The user knew what features he/she was acquiring and therefore, in theory, knew exactly what features his/her computing platform had and what activities occurred on it. Further, mostly due to the technical limitations of the time (especially the limitations of the Internet) as well as the ownership that users had over their computing platform, the norm of the time was that any changes that the software producer wanted to make to the software required some conscious act of permission on the part of the user, such as purchasing and installing an upgrade. Therefore, the user was fully aware of any changes that were occurring to his/her computing platform. This paradigm is currently shifting. Beginning in the mid to late years of the first decade of the 21st century, the Internet became a feasible foundation for a cloud based computing platform. While the cloud has not yet replaced the PC as the favorite computing platform of society, users are recognizing the benefits of cloud based services, especially the link to a ubiquitously available network, and making use of cloud based services. As the cloud becomes a new foundation for a generative computing platform the question has been raised: so what?
|
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 01 April 2010 18:37 |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
Written by Bill
|
|
Thursday, 06 May 2010 16:48 |
|
A while back, when I was a Berkman intern, fellow Berktern Brian Young and I spent an afternoon modifying a Python script called BTE (Body Text Extraction). The script is an automated way to pull out the principal portion of text (the body) of an HTML document, and works by finding the portion of the document that has the highest ratio of text to tags. At the time I was interested in using BTE in a web application to do real time body extraction, which meant I needed something that was fast. BTE wasn't quite fast enough, so Brian and I made it faster (for the nerdy among you, we improved BTE from O(n3) to O(n2)). So why am I posting this now? Well Brian and I contacted BTE's author, Aidan Finn, regarding the changes, and Aidan has recently incorporated our changes into the official code. Big thanks go to Brian. I couldn't have done the coding myself (I didn't and still don't know Python,) and while at the end we weren't sure who did what, I'm sure Brian's 1337 computer hacking skills were far greater than mine. More information on BTE can be found here, and the code can be found at GitHub.
|
|
Written by Bill
|
|
Monday, 29 March 2010 22:16 |
|
Why do people jailbreak their Apple products? Sarah Perez asked this question at ReadWriteWeb and has concluded that people want better applications for their Apple products. Since the new iPad either addresses or nullifies many of the complaints posed by consumers, Perez then argues that there are far fewer (legitimate) reasons to jailbreak the iPad. As the argument goes, if you want some aspect of your iPad experience improved then talk to Apple, they will take care of your desires. Perez’s argument is about the end product, the features and quality of the computer platform that I will hold in my hands. What is missing, however, is a consideration for the process. How will that end product get made? Who will make it? What role will I, as a consumer, have in the production process? While analysis continues to revolve around the quality and features of the software on the iPad, the issue that really motivates jailbreaking is the desire to change the process that leads to software on the iPad. Autonomy is the real motivation. Consumers remember having the power to define their computing platform and there are many who are not ready to cede that power to some licensors in Cupertino.
|
|
Last Updated on Tuesday, 30 March 2010 14:06 |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
|
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 Next > End >>
|
|
Page 1 of 4 |